Alberta’s New Drug Rehab Plan: Targeting the Vulnerable While Ignoring the Privileged?

In a recent town hall meeting in Medicine Hat, Alberta, MLA Danielle Smith made a bold declaration: “We are not going to let people suffer on our streets.” While the sentiment appears compassionate on the surface, a closer look at Alberta’s proposed drug rehabilitation policies reveals a troubling focus on the most vulnerable populations--homeless individuals and those living in poverty--while seemingly ignoring the systemic issues that allow wealthier Albertans to avoid scrutiny.


The discussion, part of a broader conversation about Alberta’s 2025 budget and its approach to mental health and addiction services, highlighted the province’s plan to expand treatment programs for those struggling with substance abuse. However, critics argue that the proposed measures disproportionately target homeless individuals, raising concerns about equity and the potential for punitive measures disguised as care.


A Two-Tiered Approach to Addiction?

During the town hall, Smith emphasized the need to address the “chronic homeless” population, particularly those who cycle in and out of hospitals and emergency services. The province’s plan includes expanding supportive housing programs, such as the ARCHES initiative, which provides housing, vocational training, and health services for individuals with complex needs. While these programs are commendable, they are primarily aimed at those living on the streets or in precarious housing situations.


This raises an important question: What about those who struggle with addiction behind closed doors? Wealthier Albertans who abuse drugs in the privacy of their homes are unlikely to face the same level of intervention. The province’s focus on street-level addiction risks creating a two-tiered system where the most visible and vulnerable are forced into treatment, while those with financial means can avoid scrutiny altogether.


The Ethics of Coercion in Treatment

The proposed Compassionate Intervention Act, which Smith briefly addressed during the town hall, has sparked significant debate. The act would allow the government to mandate treatment for individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others. While the intention is to help those in crisis, critics argue that such measures could disproportionately affect homeless individuals, who are more likely to be seen as “public nuisances” due to their visibility.


“I asked specifically if the government was going to be moving forward with the compassionate inquiry act; the response Justin Wright gave me was: ABSOLUTELY NOT!”


The concern is valid. Forced treatment programs, while well-intentioned, often fail to address the root causes of addiction, such as poverty, trauma, and lack of access to mental health care. By focusing on the most visible symptoms of the crisis--homelessness and public drug use--the province risks ignoring the broader systemic issues that contribute to addiction across all socioeconomic groups.


A Call for Equity in Addiction Treatment

Progressive advocates argue that any effective drug rehabilitation strategy must be equitable and address the needs of all Albertans, regardless of their socioeconomic status. This includes expanding access to voluntary treatment programs, increasing funding for mental health services, and addressing the social determinants of health that contribute to addiction.


“We are looking at removing liberty from people in this province; under what research or evidence based process? ” asked a local during open questions at the town hall. “Why would we spend 180 million dollars on buildings and not use evidence-based care?”


The Path Forward

As Alberta moves forward with its plans to expand addiction treatment services, it is crucial that the province adopts a more inclusive approach. This means ensuring that all Albertans, regardless of their income or housing status, have access to the care they need. It also means addressing the systemic issues that perpetuate addiction, rather than simply focusing on the most visible symptoms.


While MLA Smith’s commitment to ending suffering on the streets is commendable, true compassion requires a more holistic and equitable approach. Alberta has the opportunity to lead the way in progressive addiction treatment--but only if it ensures that no one is left behind, whether they live on the streets or in a mansion.


As the debate continues, one thing is clear: Addiction is not a problem confined to the margins of society. It is a public health crisis that affects us all--and it demands solutions that reflect that reality.

Previous
Previous

MLA Smith Towne Hall

Next
Next

Former Police Chief Worden VS City Of Medicine Hat